a "law" is already there: they have written the sentences - the facts - Ilaria Nava, Future, March 10, 2011
In our legal system the Constitution and the Penal Code prohibiting assisted suicide. But with this framework has also reached the verdict Englaro. A decision "creative" principles which states are able to circumvent the rules and providing greater misinterpret those for right of freedom of treatment. That is why we must act in the matter clearly
I
It is said that the law on "Rules on therapeutic alliance, informed consent and advance directives for treatment ' these days in the home straight to the room is not necessary because the therapeutic to prevent euthanasia and abandonment in our system there are already required by law. According to the proponents of this theory, in fact, a law on end of life would only result in a shift to open euthanasia our legal system. Also - they say - the law, once approved, should be legally controlled the scope of end of life and may be subject in the future, changes in the pejorative sense. It is true, in our system there are legal rules which have hitherto governed the informed consent, the right to refuse or stop treatment, requests for euthanasia or assisted suicide, and the management of patients no longer able to express their consent. This is part 32 of the first Costuzione, which states that "the Republic protects health as a fundamental right of the individual and collective interest, and guarantees free medical care to the indigent. No one can be bound to a particular treatment if not required by law. The law may in no case violate the limits imposed by respect for the human person ". Then there is the article of the Criminal Code of consenting to the murder: "Whoever causes the death of a man, with his consent, shall be punished with imprisonment from six to fifteen years', one on assisted suicide, which punishes" whoever leads others to suicide or suicide reinforces the respect of others, or in any manner facilitates the execution. " the problem is that the ruling was issued Englaro with this legal framework. A set of rules which may now require un'esplicitazione, un chiarimento, una delimitazione di confini in modo chiaro e inequivoco. Si sono nel frattempo affermati altri principi nel nostro ordinamento, che aggirano le norme garantiste e interpretano quelle a favore della giusta libertà di cura e dell’autodeterminazione in senso eutanasico. Anche se il precedente ha un valore relativo, in assenza di legge i principi attualmente più significativi sono quelli stabiliti dalla Corte di Cassazione, che ha autorizzato l’interruzione delle cure «quando la condizione di stato vegetativo sia, in base ad un rigoroso apprezzamento clinico, irreversibile e non vi sia alcun fondamento medico, secondo gli standard scientifici riconosciuti a livello internazionale, che lasci supporre che la persona abbia la benché any chance of some, albeit weak, recovery of consciousness and return to a perception of the outside world "while" this instance is really expressive, based on evidence clear, consistent and convincing voice of the principal, comes from his personality, his lifestyle and his beliefs, corresponding to his way of thinking, before falling into unconsciousness, the very idea of \u200b\u200bhuman dignity "(Supreme Court, Case 21748/07) does not seem out place, then, that Parliament, repeatedly accused by the left and right of inertia, has decided to give a clear answer by the law. If you have crossed the Englaro ruoli delle istituzioni, provocando inutili intrecci di competenze. Ad esempio, la Regione Lombardia il 3 settembre 2008 aveva emesso un atto di indirizzo per evitare che il personale sanitario «venisse meno ai propri obblighi professionali e di servizio» se avesse dato esecuzione al decreto che autorizzava il distacco di Eluana.
Davanti a questo tentativo della Regione di arginare la sentenza «creativa» della Corte d’appello, il Tar della Lombardia ha risposto annullando il provvedimento e affermando tra le altre cose che «l’alimentazione e l’idratazione artificiali con sondino nasogastrico integrano prestazioni poste in essere da doctors, underlying scientific knowledge and which consist in the administration of preparations involving technological procedures. They therefore constitute a medical treatment, the cessation of which does not constitute a case of euthanasia by omission, but may be lawfully required in the interests of the incapacitated person "(Lombardy Regional Administrative Court, Case 214/09). The same Court of Appeal had stated in the decree of July 8, 2008 that "in situations where they are in the game right to health or the right to life, or more generally, is relevant to the critical relationship between doctor and patient, the foundation of all legal solution passes through the recognition of a rule (...), which ranks first freedom of therapeutic self-determination. " The action brought by the Milan prosecutor's office against the decree of the Court of Appeals was held inadmissible by the Supreme Court joined sections so that the case does not concern a "public interest and public protection but a subjective and individual 'Eluana.
end of the story, the complaint for murder of Amedia that the posting of the tube of Eluana, resulted in the closure of the case because, as stated by the investigating magistrate of Udine, the 14 suspects for Eluana death would act to "exercise a right" as "the judiciary can not on the one hand to grant a right and, second, indicted the year. " The magistrate said that "all suspects are not punishable for having undoubtedly acted in anticipation of legislative exercise of a right."
0 comments:
Post a Comment