Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Mount And Blade Shirt



Avvenire.it, March 9, 2011 - More about adoptions and "single" - but the 'dynamic' does not substitute for the family of Francesco D'Agostino

In a press release, the Italian Association of Psychology takes a position on a recent ruling of the Court of Cassation, in a passage from which emerges a hope that the legislature can "provide the Competition of specific circumstances, such a widening of the eligibility of the adoption of children by a single person with the legitimizing effects of the adoption. " Of little interest to psychologists, of course, to assess the significance of this ruling, which rightly Joseph Anzalone considered little more than an 'exit clumsy "(Future, 16 February), they take the opportunity to criticize those who, in the debate following the decision, stressed that children, to grow well, they need a mother and a father. These statements were "not to be found in international research on the relationship between family relations and psycho-social development of individuals."
According to the results of psychological research, read the statement, would dispute that 'the psychosocial well-being of members of family groups is not so much tied to the form that the group gained, as to the quality of processes and relational dynamics are actualized in it. " In conclusion, it would be "neither il numero né il genere dei genitori – adottivi o no che siano – a garantire di per sé le condizioni di sviluppo migliori per i bambini, bensì la loro capacità di assumere questi ruoli e le responsabilità educative che ne derivano».
Attendo che queste affermazioni (che sono palesemente finalizzate a legittimare aperture normative a forme di familiarità 'alternative') siano corroborate da prove adeguate e condivise. La questione rilevante, però, non è questa, ma piuttosto il fatto che l’affidamento dei bambini non è in prima battuta un problema psicologico, bensì antropologico, perché volto a tutelare prima ancora che la felicità soggettiva of the individual, the succession of generations. It is clear that no one is deprived of the opportunity 'thrive' and fulfilled in life, can be dramatic as his family's experiences. Of the human resources are boundless and can balance the most tragic events and humiliating love (there is no need to mention biographies of many small heroes of Dickens) can make their way in the most unexpected and outstanding results . Ishmael was abandoned by his father Abraham, and none the less becomes the ancestor of a 'big people'. This is not to deny that "what is important for the welfare of children is the quality of the environment family that the parents provide them, regardless of whether they are cohabiting, separated, remarried, single, same-sex "(as claimed by the press of psychologists). Not at all, but on a part of this statement (which is not fully supported by adequate evidence) we could also agree, at least in principle. But what should rather be profoundly important to everyone is to reaffirm that any society, or at least certainly 'our' society, is based on stable family structures and recognized, with a potential and natural fertility, a foundation of personal morality (the reciprocal commitment of the spouses) and a public legal recognition (marriage). Not by chance the Supreme Court, whatever the opinion that one should give his ruling, make a wish for the expansion of the adoption law only "in the competition of the particular circumstances." It should be clear to everybody that the care and protection they are entitled to children should be routinely backed by a parental couple and a 'normal' family environment and not a mere 'good will' psychological generously willing to care for adults them. The family is the institutional structure that guarantees the succession of generations, as demonstrated by the fact that the guarantees, so to speak spontaneously and not for compliance with a legal obligation.
Concludendo il suo comunicato, l’Associazione italiana di psicologia «invita i responsabili delle istituzioni politiche, sociali e religiose del nostro paese a tenere in considerazione i risultati che la ricerca scientifica ha prodotto sui temi in discussione». Auspico, con pari fermezza, che, oltre ai risultati di ricerche psicologiche, si tengano presenti quelli della riflessione antropologica e giuridica in materia e soprattutto del portato di quell’esperienza storica e morale plurisecolare, di cui siamo tutti gli eredi.

0 comments:

Post a Comment